Asked by: Jalil Rubias
Asked in category: automotive, green vehicles, automotive, green vehicles
Last Updated: 15th May 2024

Are cruises better for the environment than flying?

"Despite all the attention being paid to airline emissions, it is clear that cruise liners are much more polluting per passenger km than planes. Their record on environmental pollution is poor, and they produce enormous amounts waste.



This is why flying or driving is better for the environment.

ThoughtCo. According to ThoughtCo., driving produces less greenhouse-gas emissions that flying. Sierra Club also reported that domestic airliners are more fuel efficient than cars. The same logic applies to flying nonstop. This is more efficient than booking a trip that includes layovers.

What is worse for the environment: cruising or flying? Because there is more space per person, each person contributes to a greater amount of the plane's pollution. Cruising uses less fuel than taking off. This is true for shorter flight . It also means that direct flights are less polluting than multi-leg trips.

Is it better to fly or cruise?

Environmental groups point out that passengers often fly to cruise ships, increasing their carbon footprint. "Despite all the attention being paid to airline emissions, it is clear that cruise liners are much more polluting per passenger km than planes.

How harmful is air travel to the environment?

Flying requires a lot energy and releases a lot carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Burning jet fuel emits greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and oceans. The greenhouse gases prevent heat from escaping from our atmosphere, which causes temperatures to rise like in a greenhouse.